more on this theme     |     more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 2428

[filed under theme 17. Mind and Body / C. Functionalism / 7. Chinese Room ]

Full Idea

Opponents typically reply to Searle's argument by conceding that the person in the room does not understand Chinese, and arguing that the understanding should instead be attributed to the system consisting of the person and the pieces of paper.

Gist of Idea

Maybe the whole Chinese Room understands Chinese, though the person doesn't

Source

David J.Chalmers (The Conscious Mind [1996], 4.9.4)

Book Ref

Chalmers,David J.: 'The Conscious Mind' [OUP 1997], p.323


A Reaction

Searle himself spotted this reply. It seems plausible to say that a book contains 'understanding', so the translation dictionary may have it. A good Room would cope with surprise questions.